Skip to main content

Safety

OSHA Terminology

Navigating the administrative landscape of laboratory safety requires a precise understanding of the terminology and legal structures established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Compliance is not merely a checklist activity; it is a dynamic management process governed by specific standards, broad mandates, and strategic hierarchies designed to minimize risk. Understanding these concepts enables the Laboratory Safety Officer to build a legally defensible and operationally safe environment

Hierarchy of Controls

The Hierarchy of Controls is a strategic framework used to select the most effective method for mitigating a hazard. It is visualized as an inverted pyramid, prioritizing controls that physically remove the danger over those that rely on worker behavior

  • Elimination & Substitution (Most Effective): Physically removing the hazard or replacing it with a less toxic alternative (e.g., switching from xylene to a citrus-based clearing agent)
  • Engineering Controls: Isolating the worker from the hazard using physical barriers or mechanics (e.g., Biosafety Cabinets, chemical fume hoods, retractable needles)
  • Administrative Controls: Changing work practices or schedules (e.g., SOPs, training, job rotation)
  • Personal Protective Equipment (Least Effective): Wearable barriers (e.g., gloves, respirators). PPE is the last line of defense because it relies entirely on user compliance and creates a single point of failure

Regulatory Framework

OSHA regulations (29 CFR Part 1910) govern general industry and clinical laboratories. Understanding the nuance between different types of guidance is critical for management:

  • Specification Standards: Rigid regulations that dictate exactly how a hazard must be controlled (e.g., guardrail height requirements)
  • Performance Standards: Flexible regulations that set a safety objective but allow the employer to decide the method of compliance. The Laboratory Standard (29 CFR 1910.1450) is a performance standard, requiring a Chemical Hygiene Plan that limits exposure without mandating specific equipment brands or workflows
  • Official Advisories: When regulations are vague, OSHA issues Letters of Interpretation. These are not laws, but they establish enforcement precedents and clarify how standards apply to specific scenarios (e.g., clarifying rules on hydration in the lab)

General Duty Clause

Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act, known as the General Duty Clause, serves as the “catch-all” enforcement tool for hazards that lack a specific written standard

  • The Mandate Employers must provide a workplace free from “recognized hazards” that are likely to cause death or serious harm
  • Application: In the laboratory, this clause is frequently used to cite hazards regarding Ergonomics (repetitive strain injuries) and Workplace Violence, as there are no specific federal standards addressing these risks. To avoid citation, management must demonstrate they have recognized these industry hazards and implemented feasible abatement methods