Skip to main content

Safety

Safety Officer/Committee

In the context of the clinical laboratory, safety management is not merely a reactive set of protocols for handling spills or fires; it is a proactive, administrative discipline that integrates regulatory compliance with operational efficiency. The administrative phase of safety focuses heavily on Planning. This involves the strategic anticipation of hazards, the allocation of resources to mitigate those hazards, and the establishment of a governance structure - specifically the Safety Officer and the Safety Committee - to oversee the effectiveness of the safety program. Effective planning shifts the laboratory culture from compliance-based (following rules to avoid fines) to risk-based (understanding and mitigating specific dangers)

The Laboratory Safety Officer (LSO)

The Laboratory Safety Officer (often synonymous with the Chemical Hygiene Officer in OSHA terminology) is the cornerstone of the safety planning architecture. This individual is designated by laboratory administration to provide technical guidance and administrative oversight. While the ultimate legal responsibility for safety lies with the laboratory director or CEO, the LSO is the functional planner and executor of the safety management system. The LSO must possess both the technical knowledge to recognize hazards and the administrative authority to halt operations if an immediate danger exists

Planning Responsibilities of the LSO

  • Regulatory Surveillance: The LSO must maintain a current understanding of regulations from OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration), EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), CAP (College of American Pathologists), and TJC (The Joint Commission). Planning involves anticipating regulatory changes and updating laboratory policies before audits occur
  • Manual Maintenance: The LSO is responsible for the annual review and revision of the Chemical Hygiene Plan (CHP) and the Exposure Control Plan (ECP). This is a planning activity that requires assessing new methodologies or instruments introduced over the past year and updating safety protocols to match
  • Training Curriculum Design: Rather than simply delivering training, the LSO plans the educational curriculum. This involves identifying gaps in staff knowledge (e.g., increased ergonomic injuries or needle sticks) and designing specific modules to address these trends
  • Resource Allocation: The LSO participates in the budgetary planning process, ensuring funds are earmarked for safety equipment (fume hood certification, PPE procurement, spill kit replenishment) and occupational health services (vaccinations, post-exposure prophylaxis)

The Laboratory Safety Committee

While the LSO handles daily execution, the Laboratory Safety Committee functions as the deliberative body for safety planning. It serves as a forum for cross-departmental communication, ensuring that safety policies are practical and uniform across different sections (e.g., Microbiology, Chemistry, Blood Bank). The committee typically meets monthly or quarterly and produces minutes that serve as legal documentation of the laboratory’s commitment to safety

Committee Composition & Structure

  • Diverse Representation: To be effective, the committee must include bench-level staff from various technical sections, phlebotomy, and support services, as well as management representatives. This ensures that planning accounts for the reality of workflow at the bench
  • Ad-Hoc Members: Planning often requires input from external departments; therefore, representatives from Facilities/Engineering (for ventilation and waste), Security, and Employee Health often attend relevant meetings

Strategic Planning Functions of the Committee

  • Accident and Incident Review: The committee reviews incident reports not to assign blame, but to perform Root Cause Analysis (RCA). The planning aspect involves synthesizing this data to recommend systemic changes - such as substituting a hazardous chemical or altering a workflow - to prevent recurrence
  • Audit Review: The committee reviews findings from internal safety audits and external inspections. They plan the “Corrective Action Plan,” assigning specific tasks and deadlines to resolve deficiencies
  • Goal Setting: A mature safety committee establishes annual safety goals (e.g., “Reduce sharps injuries by 10%” or “Achieve 100% compliance on chemical inventory updates”). These goals drive the educational and operational focus for the coming year

Risk Assessment & Management Planning

Risk assessment is the analytical process used by the LSO and Committee to prioritize safety planning. It moves beyond a generic “safety first” motto to a structured evaluation of specific hazards. The goal is to determine the Risk Level by analyzing the Likelihood of an event occurring versus the Severity of the consequence. This creates a matrix that dictates which hazards require immediate resource allocation

Job Hazard Analysis (JHA)

A Job Hazard Analysis is a primary planning tool. It breaks down complex laboratory procedures into individual steps to identify hazards associated with each specific action

  • Step-by-Step Breakdown: The LSO or section supervisor lists every step of a procedure (e.g., “Remove cap from specimen tube”)
  • Hazard Identification: For each step, potential hazards are identified (e.g., “Aerosol generation,” “Repetitive motion,” “Exposure to bloodborne pathogens”)
  • Control Measure Planning: The final step is planning the specific control to mitigate that hazard (e.g., “Use biosafety cabinet,” “Automated decapping,” “Face shield”)

Hierarchy of Controls

When planning mitigation strategies for identified risks, the Safety Officer and Committee must adhere to the Hierarchy of Controls. This hierarchy ranks risk management strategies from most effective to least effective. Administrative planning should always aim for the top of the hierarchy before settling for the bottom

  • Elimination (Most Effective): Physically removing the hazard. Example: Discontinuing a test that uses a carcinogen in favor of a molecular method.
  • Substitution: Replacing the hazard. Example: Replacing xylene with a less toxic histological clearing agent or using cyanide-free hemoglobin reagents.
  • Engineering Controls: Isolating people from the hazard. Example: Planning for the installation of Biosafety Cabinets (BSC), fume hoods, and negative pressure rooms for TB testing.
  • Administrative Controls: Changing the way people work. Example: Implementing rotation schedules to reduce repetitive strain, establishing work practices, and defining restricted access areas.
  • Personal Protective Equipment - PPE (Least Effective): Protecting the worker with barriers. Example: Lab coats, gloves, and respirators. In safety planning, PPE is the “last line of defense” because it relies entirely on user compliance to be effective.

Emergency Preparedness Planning

A critical subset of risk management is planning for non-routine catastrophic events. The Safety Committee is responsible for developing the “Continuity of Operations Plan” (COOP). This planning ensures that the laboratory can either maintain critical services or safely shut down during disasters

  • Drill Planning: Scheduling and evaluating fire drills, chemical spill drills, and infant abduction (Code Pink) drills. The evaluation phase is crucial for updating the plan
  • Supply Chain Planning: Ensuring a stockpile of critical safety supplies (N95 respirators, disinfectants) in case of supply chain disruption, as seen during global pandemics
  • Utility Failure: Planning procedures for power outages (identifying which analyzers are on red emergency outlets) and ventilation failure (procedures for securing fume hoods)